The recovery involves interests of different order and degree, public and private, and must deal not only deal with the desires of the public that aims to maintain the existing heritage but also with the development needs of a given territory.
The owner looks at the buildings as an instrumental asset and generally requires that the intervention recovery isbe economically convenient, even inif made of a possible revenue in the re-usereuse of the existing organism. In a farm, the possible reuse must also be functional concerning overall work organization; operations. Operations of recovery that are motivated by reasons aesthetic or cultural reasons are considered completely questionable and not accepted. The Municipalitymunicipality, which represents the interests of collectivitythe collective, looklooks at buildings as a historical-cultural heritage and aims to safeguard them to enhance the territory, demanding for this the respect of certain formal quality characters. The next step is to understand how it goesintervention is realized intervention in each of these buildings.
It is not only the problem of the form involved but also the problem of the function, the(the new destination of useplan for use), since the idea is that a building must, however, be reused to be able to continue to liveexist.