In \cite{Ref12}, the authors inspect error control coding (ECC) to decide the energy proficiency of particular ECC executions in WSNs. They have additionally infers an expression for the critical distance where the decoder's energy consumption per bit rises to the transmit energy savings per bit. Furthermore, they demonstrate that the analog decoder's offer the most energy proficient ECC arrangement, getting to be energy effective at distances from $\frac{1}{4}$ to $\frac{1}{2}$ the critical distances of the digital decoders. The authors in \cite{Ref16} gives a few confirmations that low-power sensor channels' bit error rate (BER) tends to easily differ to progressively alter the FEC code size for enhancing the sensor system execution. It likewise proposes an adaptive FEC code control calculation called AFECCC and assesses its execution under different channel models and over genuine sensor systems. AFECCC powerfully coordinates the FEC code size to the low-frequency wireless channel BER, which is assessed by acknowledgement packet arrivals.
In \cite{Ref17}, the authors simulated several ECC techniques by analyzing the wireless channel, and the power consumption values for several selected ECC are shown. It is concluded that the RS (31,21) has been selected after the comparison of power consumption and BER analysis, for achieving low power consumption.